And since I am short on time but feel like I'm cheating some people by not posting (yes you Ems), today I present to you my Guilt Ridden Three. The first one of whom I share with ms cynic. I think she's rather fond of my third choice too.
Anyway, here he is... at his most unattractive, which I actually find a real turn on. The divine Alan Rickman.

I will point out I am well aware that he is:
a) in his 60's;
b) has horrible teeth;
c) has wrinkles you could park a car in; and
d) sneers a lot.
But he has a very sexy voice which is more than enough to make up for those and any other negatives.
I will happily go on the record in saying I. Would. Shag. Him. Anytime.
I would.
Second up, we have another British thespian (well, Irish but he's Northern Irish and moved to England as a kid and doesn't sound Northern Irish).
The lovely Kenneth Branagh.

I've always been a bit of a fan of a bloke who can rattle off Shakespeare at the drop of a hat (potential suitors take note) and I don't care what anyone says, I liked, nay LOVED his version of Hamlet. All four and bit hours of it.
I even fancied him in Much Ado About Nothing, where he was sporting a full beard, and as many a former boyfriend will attest, I am not a fan of facial hair.
The only thing I didn't really find him terribly attractive in, despite the lovely robes, was Harry Potter & The Chamber of Secrets. You know, when he looked like this:

Not his most attractive look. And they didn't really utilise him enough for my liking. But if you stayed right to the very very end of the credits, there was a lovely little snippet of Gilderoy gone loopy and in a straightjacket.
Yes. I was the only person left in the cinema at that stage. I didn't care. I think its rude not to stay for the credits. A lot of people put a lot of work into film making and for most of them this is their only shot at recognition.
Anyway.
Let's move on to number three. I feel quite wrong choosing this man, I don't know why. There's something so deliciously evil and nasty about him. He's probably ever so nice in real life, but his roles are always so... sleazy.
I present, number three:

James Spader.
I get the heebee geebees just typing his name. I've fancied him ever since I first saw him in Pretty in Pink. I'm addicted to Boston Legal just because he's in it. Secretary rates as of one of my favourite movies of the last decade.
Its wrong. Very, very, horribly, terribly wrong.
But oh so right.
So there you go. Or do you?
Now, I know this was meant to be a list of just three, but I have to add someone who only narrowly missed out. In fact, I had to flip a coin between him and James. He may not be terribly well known to the Aussies, but I'm betting that my Pommy mates will be pissing themselves when they see his face.
He is:
The musical theatre darling of the West End. The original Marius in Les Miserables, the original Alex in Aspects of Love, Eurovision Song Contest entrant 1992 (with the tacky yet catchy One Step Out of Time) and possibly the naffest singer to come out of Britain since Sir Cliff Richard.
I've seen him in concert at the Royal Albert Hall (two gay blokes sitting to my left, a nana & grandpop from Essex to my right - we had a wonderful time) and even right here in Sydders at Star City (where else?!).
He's tubby, jowly and possibly gay, but I still fancy him.
So STOP LAUGHING EMS. And you too Kate.
Rude.
Anyway, that's all from me. The boss returns next week (hurrah!) so my life may be a bit more manageable. A bit.
Love to all.
x

7 comments:
There are plenty of reasons to be addicted to the very brilliant and criminally underrated Boston Legal. One of them is certainly James Spader (but for me, not in a sexual way), but there are plenty more.
If he was never on the show, would you not enjoy it?
(Please note that I'm not asking if you'd stop watching if he was written out of it, because even I understand that it would leave too big a hole now that he's been in it / carried it / pressed all your buttons. But if you can imagine for a moment that he was never in it, are you saying that the show would have held absolutely no interest for you at all?)
Well, no. I would watch it if he wasn't in it, because I am fascinated (in a purely non-sexual way) with what is happening to William Shatner's face. It looks like a balloon about to burst. And he is really is going loopy, which is fun to watch.
Also, the presence of the wonderful Candice Bergin is an additional reason to watch.
I'm glad they got rid of that Lake girl though... she was rubbish.
Ooh my, you have taste even if it is guilt-ridden. Alan Rickman could read a phone book and it would still sound sexy: is it wrong to find him still attractive when at his worst? Nah. (This from someone who got way too many kicks from watching David T's evil tongue flicking in HP4. Truly there is no hope for me).
A friend of mine saw Alan Rickman play lead in "Les Liasons" as Valmont and said it was painful to watch someone being THAT sexy. (She's also with you with KB having seen him on stage more times than she could count). And I too agree about staying for the credits.
I would definitely be with you on the James Spader issue, regardless of haircuts, sleazy parts etc. Sex Lies and Videotape anyone? And he's major league nasty in Secretary, but hot hot hot.
But sorry, I did giggle at bit about Michael Ball. Partly because my mother fell head over heels for him to the point of screaming and swooning at him in concert (she was in her 60s at the time). Guilt-ridden though? Not sure you need to be!
I. Am. So. With. You. On James Spader.
*swoons*
It is a bit embarassing though, isn't it?
It is elaine, it is.
I don't know why.
He makes my insides flip flop.
I could positively stare at this post all day!
I'm often told I resemble James Spader on a sexy day.
Post a Comment